Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) and its Effect on Tool Wear During Miniature Drilling :an Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26776/jemm.01.02.2016.04Abstract
Miniature drilling is widely used in industries including electronics and reconstructive surgeries to create small sized holes. Chip removal and effective supply of coolant are the two limiting factors that make the process more complex compared to other meso scale machining processes and also contribute to the tool wear. The tool wear in the process is mainly caused by the interaction, motion and chip production between the tool and work piece. Uniform supply of coolant must be ensured to reach the drilled cavity to keep the tool wear to a minimal level. This study includes experimental investigation of the tool condition after applying Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) system as a greener approach as the name indicates. The tool condition with MQL has also been compared with dry and flood cooling. Two different types of drill bit materials (High Speed Steel and Carbide) have been tested under same experimental condition to drill through Aluminum Alloy 6061 and it has been found that overall performance in terms of tool condition after applying MQL was better compared to the other two methods. The overall wear propagation area was measured for both the conditions. It was seen, the wear propagation covered minimal area with MQL while for flood and dry condition wear was spread over a bigger area on flank.Â
References
[2] Standards committee tools and clamping devices (FWS) working committee., “‘DIN 69090-1 MQL Maching Technology-Part 1.’ Terms and Definitions.,†2011.
[3] T. Walker, The HANDBOOK A guide to machining with Minimum Quantity Lubrication, V 1.0.3. Unist, Inc, 2013.
[4] M. J. Hadad, T. Tawakoli, M. H. Sadeghi, and B. Sadeghi, “Temperature and energy partition in minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process,†Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 54–55, pp. 10–17, 2012.
[5] L. R. da Silva, E. C. Bianchi, R. Y. Fusse, R. E. Catai, T. V. Fran??a, and P. R. Aguiar, “Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant-MQL in grinding,†Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 412–418, 2007.
[6] M. Rahman, a. Senthil Kumar, and M. U. Salam, “Experimental evaluation on the effect of minimal quantities of lubricant in milling,†Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 539–547, 2002.
[7] A. Iqbal, K. A. Al-Ghamdi, and G. Hussain, “Effects of tool life criterion on sustainability of milling,†J. Clean. Prod., 2016.
[8] A. Attanasio, M. Gelfi, C. Giardini, and C. Remino, “Minimal quantity lubrication in turning: Effect on tool wear,†Wear, vol. 260, no. 3, pp. 333–338, 2006.
[9] M. Hadad and B. Sadeghi, “Minimum quantity lubrication-MQL turning of AISI 4140 steel alloy,†J. Clean. Prod., vol. 54, pp. 332–343, 2013.
[10] G. T. Smith, Cutting tool technology: industrial handbook. Springer, 2008.
[11] S. Bhowmick, M. J. Lukitsch, and A. T. Alpas, “Dry and minimum quantity lubrication drilling of cast magnesium alloy (AM60),†Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 444–457, 2010.
[12] N. a M. M. Ahsan, G. M. Kibria, R. M. Ahmed, A. M. Islam, and M. M. Hossain, “Performance Evaluation of Minimum Quantity Lubrication ( MQL ) in Drilling Operation,†in International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering 2010, 2010, pp. 1–5.
[13] G. Fox-Rabinovich, J. M. Dasch, T. Wagg, K. Yamamoto, S. Veldhuis, G. K. Dosbaeva, and M. Tauhiduzzaman, “Cutting performance of different coatings during minimum quantity lubrication drilling of aluminum silicon B319 cast alloy,†Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 205, no. 16, pp. 4107–4116, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Copyright: The Author(s)
Creative Commons: CC BY 4.0
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture (IJEMM) are belonged to “The Author(s)” under terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC BY 4.0). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode